Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article proposes a four-layer phenomenological–semiotic model of appresentation, understood as the symbolic and affective co-presence of unseen dimensions within embodied spatial experience. Drawing on phenomenology, archetypal symbolism, and theories of cultural memory, the study conceptualizes sacred architecture as a dynamic field in which symbolic meaning and lived presence emerge through spatial form. Through a comparative analysis of the Giza Pyramids, Borobudur Temple, and the Jameh Mosque of Isfahan, the research examines how sacred meaning unfolds across four interrelated layers: perceptual (sensorimotor presence), mnemonic (mythic and cultural memory), semiotic (symbolic and metaphoric structures), and resonant (affective atmospheres). The study argues that sacred architecture does not merely contain ritual practices but actively mediates encounters with the Other – whether divine, ancestral, or communal – through layered spatial and symbolic structures. Tracing a trajectory from cosmic monumentality (Giza) to narrative ascent (Borobudur) and civic contemplation (Isfahan), the model reveals a historical transformation in the experience of sacred presence: from transcendental monumentality toward dialogical and embodied forms of encounter. The proposed framework offers both a theoretical lens for interpreting ritual architecture and a conceptual approach for rethinking symbolic depth in contemporary architectural design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehdilou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: