Drilling-fluid filtration is governed by coupled effects of particle size distribution (PSD), solids concentration, and particle-retention conditions, making systematic exploration by direct particle-scale simulation computationally demanding. This study integrates computational fluid dynamics–discrete element method simulations with a machine-learning surrogate to enable rapid interrogation of filtration behaviour while restricting interpretation to data-supported regions. The surrogate predicts stabilised filtrate flux from numerical retention cutoff, volume-weighted particle-size-distribution descriptors, and particle volume concentration. Predictive performance was examined using both random and input-space grouped validation, together with a k-nearest-neighbour support criterion for identifying poorly supported regions. The more demanding grouped evaluation yielded a pooled \:R²=0.955 , demonstrating useful predictive performance when compact regions of the input space were withheld. Parameter-response analysis showed that particle volume concentration produced the strongest and most consistent response, while numerical retention cutoff and volume-weighted PSD mean both produced substantial responses; the response associated with PSD standard deviation was comparatively weaker and more condition-dependent. A targeted same-framework assessment produced a mean relative prediction error of 5.76% at selected supported conditions. The novelty of the framework lies in combining physics-based filtration simulation, support-aware surrogate interrogation, condition-dependent parameter-response analysis, and targeted numerical assessment within a single workflow. The resulting approach provides a computationally efficient screening tool for prioritising supported candidate conditions for subsequent numerical or experimental confirmation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alosail et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: