Background: Glucocorticoid-induced metabolic dysfunction and insulin resistance-related abnormalities are important complications associated with dexamethasone (DEX) exposure. This study investigated the protective effects of montelukast (MNT) against DEX-induced metabolic and hepatic disturbances and characterized associated oxidative, inflammatory, leukotriene-related, and insulin-signaling changes in rats. Methods: Male Wistar rats were allocated to five groups receiving vehicle, MNT (20 mg/kg), DEX (8 mg/kg), or DEX combined with MNT (10 or 20 mg/kg). Glycemic parameters, oral glucose tolerance, lipid profile, liver function biomarkers, oxidative stress indices, inflammatory mediators, leukotriene-related markers, and hepatic histopathological and ultrastructural changes were assessed. Selected insulin-signaling and metabolic markers were evaluated using immunohistochemistry, ELISA-based assays, and Western blotting. Results: DEX administration induced hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose tolerance, increased HOMA2-IR, dyslipidemia, hepatic dysfunction, and histopathological and ultrastructural alterations. These abnormalities were accompanied by oxidative stress and changes in selected molecular markers, including SGK1, AKT, JNK, IRS1, GLUT4, PI3K/FOXO3/PPARγ, GS/PEPCK/GSK, NF-κB/IL-6, NLRP3 abundance, and leukotriene-related markers, including LTD4 and CysLT2, together with alterations in phosphorylation-associated AMPK, PI3K, and ERK1/2 signaling markers. MNT attenuated several DEX-associated metabolic, oxidative, inflammatory, and hepatic abnormalities and modulated these molecular markers. Conclusions: MNT attenuated DEX-associated metabolic and hepatic disturbances in rats, accompanied by modulation of selected SGK1-associated insulin-signaling, metabolic, oxidative, inflammatory, and leukotriene-related markers. These findings support further investigation of MNT in experimental glucocorticoid-associated metabolic dysfunction. However, the molecular findings represent associated alterations rather than definitive evidence of direct pathway activation, target engagement, or causal mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alresheedi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: