Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Reusable laryngoscope blades are exposed to oropharyngeal secretions, blood, and mucosal surfaces during airway procedures. Incomplete reprocessing can make them a preventable source of cross-contamination. This survey assessed current practices related to cleaning, disinfection, sterilization, storage, and monitoring of laryngoscope blades in Indian healthcare facilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in January 2026 among 97 healthcare professionals involved in airway management or laryngoscope handling. Data were collected using a structured 20-item questionnaire through online forms and direct interviews. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Associations between selected practice-related variables were assessed using the Chi-square test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Reusable laryngoscopes were reported by 96 respondents (99.0%). A written disinfection protocol was available in 59 facilities (60.8%). High-level disinfection was reported by 23 respondents (23.7%), whereas 20 (20.6%) were unaware of the disinfection level followed at their workplace. Swab and culture-based sterility assurance was practiced by 29 respondents (29.9%), whereas 41 (42.3%) reported no sterility testing. Inadequate postreprocessing storage was reported by 72 respondents (74.3%), and regular audit was absent in 68 facilities (70.1%). Written protocol availability was significantly associated with high-level disinfection practice (P = 0.002). Guideline familiarity was associated with sterility testing (P < 0.001), and professional role was associated with inspection frequency (P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Significant gaps were observed in laryngoscope blade reprocessing, particularly in high-level disinfection, sterility verification, storage, and audit systems. Written protocols, repeated hands-on training, objective monitoring, and structured preuse inspection can improve compliance and patient safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lavanya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: