Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ARX models are often used in system identification. Using high-order ARX models one can well describe arbitrary output noise. Combining high-order ARX models and model reduction techniques, several two-step identification methods are formed, such as the asymptotic method (ASYM) (Zhu, 1998). To extend these methods into errors-in-variables (EIV) problems, it is crucial to get reliable ARX models with input noise effects compensated. The methods based on bias-compensation are classical solutions for such a purpose. By investigating the effects of input variance determination on the parameter estimates, this paper reveals that there is a fundamental limitation in these methods: one has to make a compromise between a full compensation and a reliable model. If the input variance estimate is not well selected, large biases can occur. This difficulty increases as the order of the ARX model increases. Three ways, including a revised bias-compensating method, a generalized instrumental variable estimator (GIVE) and a frequency-domain method are then proposed to avoid unreliable estimates. A comparative simulation study between ASYM and maximum likelihood (ML) methods is also included, showing that ASYM can provide estimates with nearly optimal performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: