Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To determine the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of fluoroscopic parameters for diagnosis and staging of scapholunate (SL) instability in distal radius fractures. METHODS: Between May 2021 and March 2024, intraoperative fluoroscopic assessments were performed after fixation of unstable distal radius fractures. Imaging included anteroposterior, clenched-fist anteroposterior-ulnar deviation, true lateral, and modified scaphoid shift views. Wrist arthroscopy served as the reference standard, with staging according to Geissler (GI-GIV) and European Wrist Arthroscopy Society (EI-EV) classifications. Fluoroscopic parameters-SL gap, SL-ulnar deviation gap, SL translation, scaphoradius (SR) translation, SL angle, delta-SL angle, and delta-SR angle-were analyzed for intra- and interobserver reliability and diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Eighty-eight wrists (38 men, 50 women) were included. Fluoroscopic parameters differed significantly across SL instability stages. A staging algorithm was developed using parameters with high intra- and interobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.89) and good diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiver-operating characteristic [AUC], 0.71-1.00). The SL angle differentiated G0-II, GIII, and GIV instability, with cutoff values of 60° (AUC 0.74) and 74° (AUC 0.97). An SL angle < 60° or delta-SL angle ≤ 4°, combined with delta-SR angle > 11° (AUC 0.71), indicated non-SL instability (G0/E0), whereas delta-SR angle ≤ 11° indicated GI-II/EI-II instability. A delta-SL angle > 4° differentiated EIIIA from G0-II/E0-II (AUC 0.82) and EIIIB-C (AUC 0.88). Delta-SR angle ≤ 5° differentiated EIIIB-C from EIIIA (AUC 1.00). SL-ulnar deviation gap ≥ 2.9 mm, SL translation ≥ 1.8 mm, or SR translation ≥ 2.5 mm differentiated EIIIC from EIIIB (AUC 0.89-1.00). Advanced instability (GIV/EIV/V) was indicated by SL gap ≥ 2.5 mm, SL-ulnar deviation gap ≥ 3.2 mm, or SL translation ≥ 2.4 mm (AUC 0.86-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopic parameters identified in this study show high reliability and good diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis and staging of SL instability in distal radius fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study of consecutive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waitayawinyu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: