Path-integrated turbulence strength J summarizes total optical turbulence but omits its longitudinal distribution, which can influence finite-aperture reception. We examined this influence for a 9.92 km slant-path uplink using 36 WRF-derived Cn2 profiles from three meteorological episodes. Multiple-phase-screen simulations first assessed how J ranked receiver responses across the original profiles. For each case, we then compared transmitter-side and receiver-side redistributions with the same J, link configuration, numerical settings, and matched random phase-screen coefficients. Across the original profiles, J strongly ranked four receiver metrics (Spearman’s ρs=0.97–0.98). Under the primary redistribution, moving turbulence toward the receiver increased the median captured-power fraction by 0.78 percentage points and reduced the median aperture-power scintillation index, beam wander, and spot-radius ratio by 94.6%, 38.7%, and 27.9%, respectively. The 94.6% reduction is relative to an already low absolute transmitter-side scintillation index in several cases. All four paired effects favored the receiver-side distribution in 36/36 cases, and their directions persisted in the tested parameter, independent-seed, and numerical checks. Equal J therefore did not ensure equivalent finite-aperture responses under the examined redistribution. The effect magnitudes remain conditional on the adopted turbulence parameterization and link configuration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaohang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: