Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The use of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) is a promising regenerative treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA), but clinical response is heterogeneous. This study aimed to identify molecular features and explore clinical factors associated with PRGF non-response and explore potential biomarkers for patient stratification. Methods: One hundred patients with knee OA (Kellgren–Lawrence II–III) treated with two intra-articular PRGF injections were evaluated at baseline and 6 months. Clinical response was defined by a ≥8-point improvement in overall knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Exploratory proteomic profiling was performed in a subgroup of 33 patients (13 responders and 20 non-responders) using platelet-rich plasma-derived platelet lysate (PRP-PL) generated from the same blood-derived preparation used for treatment. Samples were analyzed by data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry, followed by a bioinformatic analysis of differential proteins and enriched pathways. To further investigate selected proteomic findings, IgA levels were quantified in PRP-PL from the entire cohort. Results: Responders showed significant improvements in pain, overall KOOS, and functional outcomes. Proteomic analysis identified a non-responder signature characterized by increased immunoglobulin chains, complement-related proteins, acute-phase molecules, extracellular matrix remodeling proteins, and metabolic stress markers. Functional enrichment revealed the activation of immune, inflammatory, and tissue remodeling pathways. IgA levels in PRP-PL were significantly higher in non-responders, consistent with the immunoglobulin-related proteomic findings. Conclusions: PRGF non-response is associated with an inflammatory and immune-related phenotype. Higher IgA levels in PRP-PL were associated with reduced treatment responsiveness and may help identify a biological phenotype less likely to benefit from PRGF treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colombini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: