Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
For small robots, annotation can outlast computation as a bottleneck: hardware is bought once, labels at every deployment. We study label efficiency for landmark detection on a humanoid soccer robot. Against soft-argmax and pooled coordinate-regression baselines on 10–100% of 1193 labeled images under one protocol and two held-out sessions, the heatmap configuration is the more label-efficient: with hyperparameters fixed on the full pool, 298 training images (509 annotated) give 0.436 PCK@10 px, which neither baseline reaches with all 1193. The heatmap and soft-argmax arms differ in target, loss and readout, so the interval compares configurations, not representations; at equal held-out false-detection rates the heatmap stays ahead at both tolerances. A validation-to-held-out gap widens from 0.245 to 0.350 PCK@10 with more labels, similarly on both sessions. Int8 conversion, on the host CPU for two checkpoints, changes PCK@10 by at most 0.003. Two Edge TPU accelerators run the detectors in 5.18 and 19.71 ms, timed alone; reduced host bandwidth slows them by 2.8 and 8.2 for the landmark network despite near-complete parameter caching. A Monte Carlo filter is accurate to centimeters in simulation; one field demonstration agrees with hand-annotated positions only to decimeters, with an unresolved frame offset. Loop latency is unmeasured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: