This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Conventional photoelectrochemical (PEC) systems typically rely on static semiconductor interfaces that merely translate biomolecular recognition into amplitude modulation of the pre-existing photocurrent, thus limiting their analytical robustness and self-validation capabilities. Herein, we report in situ ion-exchange-mediated dynamic nanointerface engineering to fabricate an analyte-programmed reconfigurable PEC–photothermal (PT) dual-mode biosensor for the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay. The Z-scheme heterostructure of a plasmonic Au nanoparticle (NP) layer-supported BiOI/AgI/indium tin oxide glass (BiOI/AgI/Au NPs/ITO) is constructed as the initial photoelectrode. In the sensing process, a CEA recognition event directly reshapes the phase composition of BiOI/AgI, charge-transfer behavior, and photoresponse polarity. The synergistic integration of the BiOI/AgI heterostructure and the close-packed layer of plasmonic Au NPs substantially enhance the light absorption, charge separation, and interfacial charge transfer, making BiOI/AgI/Au NPs/ITO a highly suitable photoelectrode for the PEC mode of the PEC–PT biosensor. This analyte-driven phase evolution reconstructs the semiconductor composition, band alignment, and charge-transfer pathways to switch the photocurrent polarity from cathodic to anodic. In addition, a photothermal imaging mode of the PEC–PT biosensor is triggered by regulating the Bi2S3 formation for intrinsic cross-validation. By integrating an artificial neural network (ANN)-assisted analysis, PEC–PT biosensors enable robust multimodal quantification and improved analytical reliability, achieving > 99.8% prediction accuracy in real-sample analysis. This is the first example of integrating a dynamic nanointerface-driven PEC–PT dual-mode biosensor with artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced multimodal analysis for CEA detection and provides a dynamic nanointerface-driven strategy for intelligent multimode biosensing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: