Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Infrared detection of small ship targets is crucial for maritime surveillance and early warning. However, low-brightness, low-pixel-count vessels are easily confused with sea clutter and sensor noise. Existing multi-scale networks can enhance local responses and aggregate contextual features, but dense cross-scale interactions propagate these clutter responses, and mask-level supervision cannot clearly distinguish the vessel from the target-like background. To address this issue, we propose a novel infrared small-ship semantic segmentation method called TALES-Net based on semantic distance alignment and local evidence selection, which consists of a Local Evidence Selection Module (LESM) and a Semantic Distance Alignment Loss (SDAL). LESM enhances center-to-surround contrast and selectively propagates reliable evidence through sparse cross-scale channel interactions and spatially gated decoding. SDAL attracts vessel features to a learnable target prototype while rejecting target-like background features. Our proposed TALES-Net method effectively enhances the ability to distinguish weak target vessels from clutter backgrounds, thereby improving its internal representation capabilities in infrared small target detection. In experiments on the IRS-Ship dataset and controlled ablation, TALES-Net effectively improves target segmentation probability while maintaining a low false alarm rate. Extensive experiments on the IRS-Ship dataset show that TALES-Net achieves pixel accuracy (pixAcc), foreground intersection over union (IoU), target detection probability (PD), and false alarm rate (FA) of 95.84%, 91.70%, 87.70%, and 0.42%, respectively. These results demonstrate that LESM and SDAL can effectively improve the sensitivity of weak target ships and suppress false alarms under complex sea clutter conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: