This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Longitudinal imaging during carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) may capture dose-related tumor evolution before clinical assessment. We investigated whether serial CT-based Δ-radiomic features follow treatment-fraction (dose escalation)-associated trajectories with prognostic relevance in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with CIRT. Methods: We analyzed 167 HNC patients receiving 16-fraction CIRT. Features were extracted from plan-CT, confirm-CT, and weekly-CT scans after 5, 9, and 13 fractions. Δ-radiomic features were defined as time-normalized relative changes from confirm-CT. Linear mixed-effects models, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and monotonicity assessments identified features with systematic longitudinal changes. Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and local recurrence (LR). Optimal prediction timing was determined using optimism-corrected C-indices. Bootstrap resampling and multivariable Cox models assessed cutoff stability and incremental value beyond clinical factors. Results: During a median follow-up of 15.2 months (range: 1.2–67.7), 64 PFS events, 18 deaths, and 24 local recurrences occurred. Five, eight, and six candidate Δ-radiomic features were retained for PFS, OS, and LR. Selected prediction time points spanned fractions 5, 9, and 13. In multivariable analyses, four PFS-related features met the predefined robustness criteria and improved discrimination over the clinical model (C-index, 0.646–0.661 vs. 0.580; likelihood ratio test, p = 0.002–0.004). Sequential adjustment retained two OS-related and two LR-related features. Exploratory histology-specific analyses provided some support, primarily for two PFS-related features. Conclusions: Serial CT-based delta-radiomics identified treatment-fraction-associated imaging features associated with clinical endpoint risk after CIRT for HNC, particularly PFS. These findings are exploratory and require prospective external validation before clinical application.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: