Background/Objectives: Published estimates of histopathological examination (HPE) contribution in medicolegal autopsy use different denominators and outcome definitions. We examined what these estimates measure and their implications for practice. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to 31 May 2026 (PROSPERO CRD420261401909). Eligible studies reported denominator-specific HPE contribution. Cause of death (COD) provision and change were distinguished from manner change, confirmation, refinement, and targeted forensic interpretation. JBI checklists supported item-level appraisal. Findings were synthesized narratively without pooling. Results: Twenty-one studies were included from 2287 identified records. Strict COD change was reported in 0/100 uncomplicated hanging suicides and 1/189 gross-clear medicolegal autopsies. A broad systematic-histology cohort reported histology-only COD provision in 36/428 cases. In separate unresolved-COD populations, studies reported COD provision in 49/203 and 40/71 cases. These results address different diagnostic questions and do not establish a relationship between uncertainty and yield. Selected denominators, composite outcomes, and incomplete separation from other investigations limited interpretation. Confirmation, injury assessment, and organ-specific findings represented additional functions. Conclusions: There is no single transferable HPE yield: the pre-HPE diagnosis, denominator, outcome definition, and contribution of other investigations must accompany each estimate. The review supports clearer reporting and interpretation of HPE contribution; low rates of COD change do not establish when histology can safely be omitted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sait et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: