Background/Objectives: Evidence integrating patient-reported outcomes with the clinical performance of orthodontic miniscrews remains limited. This study evaluated pain, miniscrew-related oral impact, and six-month clinical outcomes following miniscrew placement. Methods: In this single-centre prospective observational cohort, 111 patients were screened, 104 were enrolled, and 100 patients receiving 270 clinically indicated miniscrews contributed complete data. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale immediately after placement, at 24 h, and at one week. A preliminary eight-item miniscrew-related oral-impact questionnaire was completed at one week. Analyses included the Friedman test with Holm-adjusted pairwise comparisons, Spearman correlations, and logistic generalised estimating equations (GEEs) accounting for within-patient clustering. Results: Median pain decreased from 6.0 (IQR, 3–8) immediately after placement to 4.0 (IQR, 0–7.25) at 24 h and 0.0 (IQR, 0–2) at one week (p < 0.001; Kendall’s W = 0.568; pairwise r = 0.366–0.758). Analgesics were used by 57% of participants. The mean oral-impact score was 6.08 ± 5.92 on a 0–32 scale. Greater immediate post-placement pain was associated with higher oral-impact scores (ρ = 0.431; p < 0.001). At six months, 250 of 270 miniscrews were successful (92.6%). At the miniscrew level, soft-tissue injury and localised inflammation affected 7.8% and 4.4%, respectively. No examined factor was reliably associated with failure in the clustered GEE model. At the patient level, 78% were satisfied or very satisfied, and 92% would recommend the procedure. Conclusions: Pain decreased substantially within one week, while greater early pain was associated with less favourable oral-impact scores. A 92.6% six-month success rate and favourable patient acceptance were observed. The questionnaire requires further validation, and the exploratory failure estimates require confirmation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hadi Mohmmad Ismail (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: