Aircraft fleet maintenance must translate uncertain health information into executable decisions under shared resource constraints. We present belief-guided risk-aware multi-agent scheduling (BRiMS), a framework linking probabilistic health beliefs and diagnostic inspection to hierarchical maintenance decisions and explicit execution checks. Action-level records identify how the policy, controller and environment contribute to constraint satisfaction. Multi-seed simulations evaluate 10-aircraft and 200-aircraft fleets. In the main small-fleet stress case, availability is 0.9217, high-risk exposure is 0.0075 and task completion is 38.9%. The corresponding large-fleet values are 0.916, 0.0077 and 44.0%. Both cases satisfy the prescribed safety and availability constraints in every evaluated episode. Under normal small-fleet demand, completion reaches 82.5% and availability reaches 0.963. Paired comparisons with recurrent proximal policy optimisation (RPPO) support lower high-risk exposure and constraint violation. Diagnostic-quality experiments quantify inspection benefits. Risk-weight, controller-off and frozen-policy tests further identify the conditions in which execution controls sustain feasibility. These results support auditable risk-aware maintenance coordination within the evaluated settings. Joint reporting of risk, availability and service completion provides a basis for adding service requirements and calibrating the framework to operational fleets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: