Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lifespan varies among individuals, and this variation arises both from heterogeneity (e.g., in sex or race) and from unavoidable individual stochasticity. Treating a heterogeneous population as a mixture of groups, each experiencing different rates, makes it possible to partition lifespan variance into a between-group component due to heterogeneity and a within-group component due to chance. Until now, such studies could only treat factors one at a time. This paper presents an analysis that applies to multi-factor studies and quantifies the contribution of multiple factors and their interactions to variance in lifespan. As a case study it is applied to life table data from a four-factor (sex, marital status, education, and race) study of longevity in the U.S. population, 2015–2019. Even accounting for four main factors, six two-way interactions, four three-way interactions, and one four-way interaction, between-group heterogeneity accounts for only 7% to 10% of lifespan variance. Education and its interactions make the largest contribution. Main effects make the largest contributions; those of two-way, three-way, and four-way interactions are orders of magnitude smaller.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hal Caswell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: