Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The inclusion of maritime shipping in the European Union Emissions Trading System may encourage carriers to add non-European Union transshipment calls to reduce compliance costs, creating potential carbon-avoidance hubs and reshaping liner networks. This study identifies such hubs on the Far East–Northwest Europe route using 2024 automatic identification system data. A structure–service framework first evaluates port comprehensive importance by combining improved topological indicators with turnaround efficiency, berth capacity and operational stability. An avoidance-attractiveness model then incorporates carbon price, fuel pathway, detour and port costs, feeder connection, secondary emissions, physical accommodation and risk exposure. Results show a stable Far East-centered network and clear differences between structural and service-based port rankings. Avoidance expansion is threshold-based: Tanger Med and Suez-adjacent ports are robust avoidance-sensitive nodes, whereas West African ports are marginal only at high carbon prices. Green ammonia removes the carbon-saving basis, and risk constraints narrow feasible options.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: