Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Boerhaave syndrome is a rare surgical emergency, defined as a spontaneous perforation of the esophagus. Treatment options include endoscopic intervention and/or surgery, but the morbidity and mortality associated with Boerhaave syndrome is high. No consensus-based treatment guidelines currently exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diversity in treatment strategies for different clinical scenarios of Boerhaave syndrome across Europe. Forty-four surgeons from 24 different esophageal tertiary centers across nine European countries, Australia and the United Kingdom were invited to participate in this case-vignette study. Each surgeon was presented with four different cases of patients with Boerhaave syndrome and asked for their choice of initial treatment using a multiple-choice questionnaire. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of treatment choice. Thirty-one surgeons from 21 centers (20 in Europe across 9 countries and 1 in Australia) participated in the study. The proportion of surgeons selecting endoscopic treatment varied across the four cases (45%-84%, P < 0.01). Endoscopic treatment was associated with younger patient age (OR 0.83, 95% CI [0.75, 0.92], P < 0.01), absence of sepsis (OR 0.11, 95% CI [0.00, 0.16], P < 0.01) and increased time to treatment (OR 1.97, 95% CI [1.17, 3.31], P = 0.01). All surgeons working at Nordic centers (N = 6) exclusively opted for endoscopic treatment. We found considerable diversity in treatment strategies among surgeons presented with identical cases of patients with Boerhaave syndrome. Notably, all surgeons working at a Nordic center selected endoscopic treatment as their initial treatment strategy in all four cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hauge et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: