We analyze how higher task rewards affect the gender performance gap using data from a selective Brazilian university's admission exam. Our data allow us to control for applicants' major-choice self-selection issues flexibly and to track applicants' labor market outcomes years later. We find that women's performance decreases relative to men's in higher-reward subjects due to differing exam strategies. Looking at future labor market outcomes, we find that performing well on higher-reward subjects positively relates to wages. However, our findings cast doubt on whether gender differences in prioritizing rewarding tasks in an exam environment can explain the gender wage gap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borges et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: