Key result
AF complicating acute MI is linked to ~30% higher 30-day mortality.
Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute myocardial infarction has been primarily studied in small prethrombolytic era trials, necessitating updated clinical and outcome data.
Does the presence of atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute myocardial infarction increase the risk of mortality and stroke?
Cohort (n=40,891)
Yes
Does the presence of atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute myocardial infarction increase the risk of mortality and stroke?
Atrial fibrillation occurring in the setting of acute myocardial infarction is an independent predictor of stroke and increased 30-day mortality, suggesting a need for more aggressive management.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the clinical predictors and angiographic and clinical outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND: This condition has been studied primarily in prethrombolytic era small trials. METHODS: We compared baseline clinical characteristics, short-term clinical and angiographic outcomes and 1-year mortality of patients enrolled in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial with atrial fibrillation on admission electrocardiography (n = 1,026 [2.5%]) or after enrollment (n = 3,254 [7.9%]) and those without atrial fibrillation (n = 36,611 [89.6%]). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to assess relations between baseline factors and the development of atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: Patients with any atrial fibrillation more often had three-vessel coronary artery disease and initial Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade < 3 flow than those without the arrhythmia. In-hospital stroke was increased in patients with atrial fibrillation (3.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.0001), mainly ischemic stroke (1.8% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.0001). Significant multivariable predictors of later atrial fibrillation included advanced age, higher peak creatine kinase levels, worse Killip class and increased heart rate. The unadjusted mortality rate was significantly higher at 30 days (14.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.0001) and at 1 year (21.5% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.0001) in patients with atrial fibrillation. The adjusted 30-day mortality rate remained significantly higher with any (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 1.4) or later (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.5) atrial fibrillation but not with baseline atrial fibrillation (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute MI independently predicts stroke and 30-day mortality. More aggressive treatment strategies in this subgroup may be warranted and deserve further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crenshaw et al. (1997) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=40,891). Atrial fibrillation (on admission or after enrollment) vs. No atrial fibrillation was evaluated on 30-day mortality (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.4, p=0.0001). Any atrial fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction was associated with significantly increased 30-day mortality (14.3% vs 6.2%; adjusted OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: