Objective This case report investigates the feasibility and potential value of an individualized precision rehabilitation protocol for large-area stroke, integrating multimodal neuromodulation under the guidance of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) and dynamic assessment. Methods A 38-year-old male with right hemiplegia and global aphasia following large left hemispheric infarction underwent an 8-month MDT-managed program. A closed-loop “assess-decide-intervene-re-assess” framework was implemented, featuring periodic multimodal evaluations (clinical scales, DTI, fMRI, EEG, 3D gait analysis). The intervention dynamically combined conventional therapy with staged neuromodulation: repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for aphasia and intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) for motor disorder, Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-robotic training and task-oriented Virtual Reality (VR) for upper limb function, and biomechanical correction with custom insoles based on gait analysis. Results Notable functional improvements were observed: LOTCA increased by 16 points, CRRCAE subscale improved by 60%–90%, FMA increased from 20 to 56, FMA-B reached 12, and MBI improved from 40 to 91. Neuroimaging revealed increased fractional anisotropy (FA) in the corpus callosum and right corticospinal tract, and elevated ALFF/ReHo in right frontal-temporal areas. Event-related desynchronization (ERD) decreased during BCI training, and gait parameters improved. Conclusion In this patient with large-area stroke who showed limited response to conventional rehabilitation, an MDT-guided, dynamically adjusted multimodal intervention was temporally associated with concurrent recovery across cognitive, language, motor, and daily living domains. The concomitant neural changes suggest possible trans-hemispheric network reorganization. These observations are hypothesis-generating and, while limited by the single-case design, provide a preliminary rationale for future investigations into precision neurorehabilitation approaches in similar complex cases. Clinical trial registration ChiCTR2300069203.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: