Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUNDS: Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) is a heterogeneous disease, and diagnosis is sometimes difficult. We investigated the diagnostic performance of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold assay (QFT-GIT) according to sites of EPTB and predictors for false-negative QFT-GIT results. METHODS: A total of 2176 patients were registered with active TB from January 2012 to December 2016 in Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, a 1200-bed tertiary teaching hospital in Seoul, Korea. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 163 EPTB patients who underwent QFT-GIT. RESULTS: False negative QFT-GIT results were found in 28.8% (95% CI 0.22-0.36) of patients with EPTB. In the proven TB group, negative QFT-GIT results were found in 28.6% (95% CI 0.04-0.71) of pleural, 8.3% 0.002-0.38of lymph node, 8.3% (95% CI 0.002-0.38) of skeletal and 5.8% (95% CI 0.001-0.28) of gastrointestinal TB cases. Among probable TB cases, QFT-GIT negative results were identified in 46.2% (95% CI 0.19-0.75) of skeletal, 33.3% (95% CI 10-0.65) of pericardial, 30.8% (95% CI 0.09-0.61) of pleural and 17.2% (95% CI 0.10-0.56) of gastrointestinal TB cases. In the possible TB cases, central nervous system TB (n = 21) was most frequent, and 66.7% (95% CI 0.43-0.85) of those showed QFT-GIT negative results. By multivariate analysis, possible TB was independently associated with false-negative QFT-GIT results (OR 4.92, 95% CI 1.51-16.06, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Prudent interpretation of QFT-GIT results might be needed according to anatomic site of involvement and diagnostic criteria in patients with high suspicion of EPTB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: