Key result
Prolonged QRS widens QT dispersion by ~14% but fails to predict post-MI arrhythmias.
Why the study?
QT dispersion has been suggested and disputed as a risk marker for ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction, and the impact of delayed ventricular activation on QT dispersion and arrhythmic risk was unclear.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
724 patients 2-3 weeks after myocardial infarction
Comparison
Prolonged QRS duration and presence of late potentials vs normal QRS and absence of late potentials
Design
Observational study assessing ECG parameters and arrhythmic events
Follow-up
6 months
QT dispersion lacks arrhythmic predictive value post-MI; leaves open its utility beyond late potentials in future risk models.
QT dispersion has been suggested and disputed as a risk marker for ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction. Delayed ventricular activation after myocardial infarction may affect arrhythmic risk and QT intervals. This study determined if delayed activation as assessed by (1) QRS duration in the 12-lead ECG and by (2) late potentials in the signal-averaged ECG affects QT dispersion and its ability to assess arrhythmic risk after myocardial infarction. QT duration, JT duration, QT dispersion, and JT dispersion were compared to QRS duration in the 12-lead ECG and to late potentials in the signal-averaged ECG recorded in 724 patients 2-3 weeks after myocardial infarction. Prolonged QRS duration (> 110 ms) and high QRS dispersion increased QT and JT dispersion by 12%-15% (P < 0.05). Presence of late potentials, in contrast, did not change QT dispersion. Only the presence of late potentials (n = 113) was related to arrhythmic events during 6-month follow-up. QT dispersion, JT dispersion, QRS duration, and QRS dispersion were equal in patients with (n = 29) and without arrhythmic events (QT disp 80 +/- 7 vs 78 +/- 1 ms, JT disp 80 +/- 6 vs 79 +/- 2 ms, mean +/- SEM, P > 0.2). In conclusion, prolonged QRS duration increases QT dispersion irrespective of arrhythmic events in survivors of myocardial infarction. Presence of late potentials, in contrast, relates to arrhythmic events but does not affect QT dispersion. Therefore, QT dispersion may not be an adequate parameter to assess arrhythmic risk in survivors of myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirchhof et al. (2001) studied this question. Prolonged QRS duration (>110 ms) increased QT dispersion by 12%-15% (P<0.05), but neither metric predicted arrhythmias (P>0.2), which were only associated with late potentials post-MI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: