Key result
Warfarin genotyping linked to ~31% lower hospitalization risk compared to historical controls.
Why the study?
Genotypic variations in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 predict warfarin dosing, but no large-scale prospective studies have evaluated the clinical effectiveness of genotyping in naturalistic U.S. settings.
Does genotype testing reduce the incidence of hospitalizations in outpatients initiating warfarin treatment?
Cohort (n=3,584)
Yes
Does genotype testing reduce the incidence of hospitalizations in outpatients initiating warfarin treatment?
Hazard Ratio: 0.69 (95% CI 0.58–0.82)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The study is interesting because it wasn't designed to determine if genotyping keeps the patient's INR in the normal range.”
Pharmacogenomic testing for CYP2C9 and VKORC1 in outpatients initiating warfarin therapy significantly reduces the risk of all-cause and bleeding/thromboembolism-related hospitalizations.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine whether genotype testing for patients initiating warfarin treatment will reduce the incidence of hospitalizations, including those due to bleeding or thromboembolism. BACKGROUND: Genotypic variations in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 have been shown to predict warfarin dosing, but no large-scale studies have prospectively evaluated the clinical effectiveness of genotyping in naturalistic settings across the U.S. METHODS: This national, prospective, comparative effectiveness study compared the 6-month incidence of hospitalization in patients receiving warfarin genotyping (n = 896) versus a matched historical control group (n = 2,688). To evaluate for temporal changes in the outcomes of warfarin treatment, a secondary analysis compared outcomes for 2 external control groups drawn from the same 2 time periods. RESULTS: Compared with the historical control group, the genotyped cohort had 31% fewer hospitalizations overall (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58 to 0.82, p < 0.001) and 28% fewer hospitalizations for bleeding or thromboembolism (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.97, p = 0.029) during the 6-month follow-up period. Findings from a per-protocol analysis were even stronger: 33% lower risk of all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.81, p < 0.001) and 43% lower risk of hospitalization for bleeding or thromboembolism (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.83, p = 0.003) in patients who were genotyped. During the same period, there was no difference in outcomes between the 2 external control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin genotyping reduced the risk of hospitalization in outpatients initiating warfarin. (The Clinical and Economic Impact of Pharmacogenomic Testing of Warfarin Therapy in Typical Community Practice Settings [MHSMayoWarf1]; NCT00830570).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Epstein et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Patients initiating warfarin treatment (n=3,584). Warfarin genotyping vs. Matched historical control group (no genotyping) was evaluated on All-cause hospitalization (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.82, p=< 0.001). Warfarin genotyping in outpatients initiating therapy was associated with a 31% lower risk of hospitalization compared to a historical control (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.58-0.82; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: