Key result
Preprocedural lateral E/e′ ≥ 10.8 is linked to ~16.2-fold higher risk of AF recurrence after ablation.
Why the study?
The discriminative accuracy and clinically useful threshold of regional E/e′ indexes for predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation have not been clearly established.
Does pre-procedural lateral E/e' ratio predict atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with nonvalvular AF undergoing initial catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=784)
No
Does pre-procedural lateral E/e' ratio predict atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with nonvalvular AF undergoing initial catheter ablation?
Hazard Ratio: 16.24 (95% CI 12.04–21.89)
Absolute Event Rate: 61.4% vs 5.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
A pre-procedural lateral E/e' ratio ≥ 10.8 is a strong, independent, noninvasive predictor of AF recurrence following catheter ablation, outperforming the septal E/e' ratio.
May aid pre-ablation recurrence risk stratification in AF; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact.
Background The discriminative accuracy of regional E/e′ indexes has yet to be clearly established in predicting atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following catheter ablation. Few studies have proposed and validated a clinically useful threshold of regional E/e′ ratios for predicting recurrence after ablation. Hence, we sought to perform a comprehensive analysis of regional E/e′ ratios for predicting AF recurrence after the procedure. Methods Data were retrospectively screened from 784 patients with nonvalvular AF. The incidence of AF recurrence was recorded during the follow-up period of 36 months after the procedure. Regional E/e′ ratios on echocardiography were obtained and analyzed to assess the association with recurrence. Results The follow-up rate reached 98.6% with the mean follow-up period was 32.2 ± 0.3 months. Of 784 patients beyond the first three months blanking period, 209 (26.7%) cases experienced AF recurrence. The lateral E/e′ ratio was higher in patients with AF recurrence compared to those with maintenance of sinus rhythm together with septal E/e′ ratio. There was no collinearity between the two regional E/e′ ratios. It was identified that the lateral E/e′ ratio appeared an incremental discriminatory performance with an optimal cut-off value ≥ 10.8 to predict AF recurrence. Further analysis confirmed the lateral E/e′ ratio as an independent predictor of the postprocedural recurrence. Conclusion The lateral E/e′ ratio might have superiority over septal E/e′ ratio as a valuable predictor for AF recurrence following ablation. Furthermore, the lateral E/e′ ratio ≥ 10.8 appeared a good discriminatory performance in predicting recurrence after the therapeutic intervention. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xia et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) (n=784). Lateral E/e′ ratio ≥ 10.8 vs. Lateral E/e′ ratio < 10.8 was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation recurrence after a three-month blanking period (HR 16.24, 95% CI 12.04-21.89, p=<0.001). A lateral E/e′ ratio ≥ 10.8 on preprocedural echocardiography independently predicted a significantly higher risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence following catheter ablation (HR 16.24).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: