Key result
Intense 3-week training is linked to ~0.7-second faster sprint times without adverse cardiac changes.
Why the study?
The effects of a 3-week training camp on performance and cardiovascular function in anaerobically dominant athletes were not well characterized.
Observational (n=23)
No
Mean Difference: -0.73
Absolute Event Rate: 35.98% vs 36.34%
p-value: p=<0.01
Supports short-term intense training in elite sprinters without adverse cardiac effects; leaves open generalizability and durability.
OBJECTIVE: To study the performance and cardiovascular function after a 3-week training camp in athletes competing in an anaerobically dominant sport. METHODS: Twenty-three competitive 400-m athletes were enrolled in this non-randomized study, 17 took part in a 3-week training camp in South-Africa (intervention), but one declined follow-up assessment, while 6 pursued in-door winter training in Sweden and served as controls. Electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, blood test analyses, maximal exercise tolerance test, and a 300-m sprint test with lactate measurements ([La]peak) were performed before and after the training camp period. RESULTS: At baseline, there were no clinically significant pathological findings in any measurements. The training period resulted in improved 300m-sprint performance [n = 16; running time 36.71 (1.39) vs. 35.98 (1.13) s; p<0.01] and higher peak lactate values. Despite 48% more training sessions than performed on home ground (n = 6), myocardial biomarkers decreased significantly (NT-pro BNP -38%; p<0.05, troponin T -16%; p<0.05). Furthermore, resting heart rate (-7%; p<0.01) and left ventricular systolic and diastolic volumes decreased -6% (p<0.01) and -10% (p<0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intense physical activity at training camp improved the performance level, likely due to improved anaerobic capacity indicated by higher [La]peak. There were no clinically significant adverse cardiac changes after this period of predominantly anaerobic training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skalenius et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy competitive 400-m sprint runners (n=23). 3-week training camp vs. In-door winter training on home ground was evaluated on 300-m sprint running time (MD -0.73 seconds, p=<0.01). A 3-week intense training camp improved 300-m sprint running time by 0.73 seconds and significantly decreased resting heart rate and myocardial biomarkers without clinically adverse cardiac changes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: