Several theories of motivation were compared to predict the effects of differ- ing schedules and intensities of aversive outcomes on performance. The per- formance of 72 subjects (divided into four experimental groups) was observed as they performed a 1-hr proofreading task in a laboratory setting. Subjects receiving sanctions on a variable ratio schedule performed poorer than sub- jects receiving aversive consequences on a continuous schedule. Results sug- gest that procedural justice factors, such as consistency, are important in understanding behavioral reactions to aversive consequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larry L. Cummings (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: