Key result
Periprocedural intravenous aspirin and unfractionated heparin did not improve functional outcomes and both were associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage.
Why the study?
The effects and risks of intravenous aspirin and unfractionated heparin during endovascular stroke treatment are unknown.
Does periprocedural intravenous aspirin or unfractionated heparin improve functional outcome or increase bleeding risk in patients with ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment?
RCT (n=628)
Open-label
Web-based procedure with permuted blocks and stratified by centre
Yes
Does periprocedural intravenous aspirin or unfractionated heparin improve functional outcome or increase bleeding risk in patients with ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment?
Periprocedural intravenous aspirin and unfractionated heparin during endovascular stroke treatment increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage without improving functional outcomes.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“We advise not to use the evaluated dosages of unfractionated heparin and acetylsalicylic acid during endovascular stroke treatment”
“This study provides an important message on the safety of adjunctive antithrombotic medications. The higher symptomatic hemorrhage rates and trend toward worse outcomes with both periprocedural aspirin and heparin argues against their use in EVT for acute stroke.”
Avoid periprocedural aspirin and heparin during endovascular stroke treatment; challenges prior assumptions favoring adjunctive antithrombotic use.
BACKGROUND: Aspirin and unfractionated heparin are often used during endovascular stroke treatment to improve reperfusion and outcomes. However, the effects and risks of anti-thrombotics for this indication are unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous aspirin, unfractionated heparin, both, or neither started during endovascular treatment in patients with ischaemic stroke. METHODS: We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial with a 2 × 3 factorial design in 15 centres in the Netherlands. We enrolled adult patients (ie, ≥18 years) with ischaemic stroke due to an intracranial large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation in whom endovascular treatment could be initiated within 6 h of symptom onset. Eligible patients had a score of 2 or more on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and a CT or MRI ruling out intracranial haemorrhage. Randomisation was done using a web-based procedure with permuted blocks and stratified by centre. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either periprocedural intravenous aspirin (300 mg bolus) or no aspirin, and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive moderate-dose unfractionated heparin (5000 IU bolus followed by 1250 IU/h for 6 h), low-dose unfractionated heparin (5000 IU bolus followed by 500 IU/h for 6 h), or no unfractionated heparin. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was the main safety outcome. Analyses were based on intention to treat, and treatment effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or common ORs, with adjustment for baseline prognostic factors. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number, ISRCTN76741621. FINDINGS: Between Jan 22, 2018, and Jan 27, 2021, we randomly assigned 663 patients; of whom, 628 (95%) provided deferred consent or died before consent could be asked and were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. On Feb 4, 2021, after unblinding and analysis of the data, the trial steering committee permanently stopped patient recruitment and the trial was stopped for safety concerns. The risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was higher in patients allocated to receive aspirin than in those not receiving aspirin (43 [14%] of 310 vs 23 [7%] of 318; adjusted OR 1·95 [95% CI 1·13-3·35]) as well as in patients allocated to receive unfractionated heparin than in those not receiving unfractionated heparin (44 [13%] of 332 vs 22 [7%] of 296; 1·98 [1·14-3·46]). Both aspirin (adjusted common OR 0·91 [95% CI 0·69-1·21]) and unfractionated heparin (0·81 [0·61-1·08]) led to a non-significant shift towards worse modified Rankin Scale scores. INTERPRETATION: Periprocedural intravenous aspirin and unfractionated heparin during endovascular stroke treatment are both associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage without evidence for a beneficial effect on functional outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steen et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Ischaemic stroke due to an intracranial large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation (n=628). Intravenous aspirin and/or unfractionated heparin vs. No aspirin and/or no unfractionated heparin was evaluated on Score on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days (adjusted common OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69-1.21). Periprocedural intravenous aspirin and unfractionated heparin did not improve functional outcomes and both were associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: