A diverse, functionally resilient gut microbiome supports metabolic, immune, and gastrointestinal (GI) health. This trial evaluated heat-killed Enterococcus faecalis EF-2001 (EF-2001®) on GI symptoms, quality of life, and gut microbiome composition in adults with excess weight and mild-to-moderate GI discomfort. In this 84-day randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, 209 adults aged 18–45 years were randomized (1:1:1) to receive EF-2001® (≥30 billion cells/day), beLP1® (reported separately), or placebo once daily after breakfast. Per-protocol analyses included 49 participants in the EF-2001® group and 54 in the placebo group. The primary endpoint was change in gastrointestinal symptoms assessed by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). Secondary endpoints included perceived stress (PSS), digestion-associated quality of life (DQLQ), serum TNF-α, lipid parameters, body composition (DEXA), and gut microbiome composition assessed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing. By Day 84, EF-2001® significantly reduced total GSRS scores compared with placebo (mean decrease 9.92 [SD 7.16] units; p = 0.0167). Significant improvements were also observed in perceived stress (PSS decrease 3.45 [SD 6.40] units; p = 0.0163) and digestion-associated quality of life (DQLQ decrease 1.25 [SD 1.90] units; p = 0.0114). Shotgun metagenomic analysis identified exploratory shifts in the gut microbiome, with directional increases in Lactobacillus , Megamonas , and Bifidobacterium and reductions in Escherichia and Klebsiella . However, no taxa reached significance after FDR correction. Serum TNF-α showed a small reduction, while lipid parameters changed minimally. EF-2001® supplementation for 84 days improved GI symptoms, perceived stress and digestion-associated quality of life, while exploratory microbiome analyses identified directional changes in selected taxa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manoharan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: