Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) poses a significant threat to livestock production in East Africa, with serotypes O, A, SAT 1, and SAT 2 persistently circulating in Ethiopia. The objective of this study was to evaluate field-level vaccine performance and compare the seroconversion kinetics of two distinct multi-serotype inactivated formulations among crossbred dairy calves in Sebeta Hawas. To achieve this, a longitudinal trial was conducted comparing a quadrivalent formulation (Vaccine 1; n = 58 calves; containing serotypes O, A, SAT 1, and SAT 2) against a trivalent formulation (Vaccine 2; n = 57 calves; containing serotypes O, A, and SAT 2). Humoral responsiveness was monitored using a solid-phase competitive ELISA (SPCE) over a 168-day post-vaccination period. To account for repeated measures, antibody reactivity profiles over time were analyzed using a Linear Mixed-Effects Model (LMM), complemented by area under the curve (AUC) summation to evaluate total integrated longitudinal percent inhibition kinetics. AUC analysis demonstrated a highly significant main effect of serotype (F(3,396) = 14.32, p < 0.0001), However, neither the main effect of vaccine type (F(1,396) = 1.33, p = 0.250) nor its interaction with the shared serotypes (F(2,396) = 0.063, p = 0.939) on AUC was statistically significant, suggesting comparable total cumulative antibody profiles globally between the formulations. Vaccine 1 maintained significantly higher estimated marginal means at specific time points (e.g., Day 56) for shared serotypes including O ( p < 0.0001), A ( p = 0.0292), and SAT 2 ( p = 0.0203), while additionally providing an independent, robust response against SAT 1. Notwithstanding these short-term kinetic advantages, both vaccines exhibited significant waning of Serotype A antibody reactivity by 168 days post-vaccination, highlighting that FMD seroconversion profiles are context-dependent and vary by serotype and duration. The quadrivalent vaccine (Vaccine 1) is the preferred choice for FMD control in Ethiopia, providing essential broader coverage via its SAT 1 component despite waning Serotype A immunity. Strategic multivalent deployment remains vital, with future work required to optimize booster strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gizaw et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: