Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Complex avian locomotor behaviors depend on the coordinated operation of neural processes involved in sensory perception, decision-making, and motor execution. Exogenous neural stimulation can alter motor output by intervening in neural processes, but its effects may depend on the current locomotor state. Here, we investigated the locomotor-state dependence of formatio reticularis medialis mesencephali (FRM) microstimulation in freely flying pigeons. Individualized stimulation parameters were screened under stable laboratory conditions and kept constant during free-flight experiments. Flight-state features before and during stimulation were extracted, and state–response models were constructed to quantify their associations with stimulation-evoked turning responses. Results showed that flight state during stimulation was more closely associated with turning responses than pre-stimulation state, with acceleration during stimulation making the largest contribution. When acceleration during stimulation was above the individual mean, turning-response dispersion decreased by 32.92%. In addition, pre-stimulation angular velocity was positively associated with acceleration during stimulation, indicating that the pre-stimulation locomotor state contains information related to the consistency of subsequent stimulation-evoked responses. These findings demonstrate that the effects of FRM microstimulation are locomotor-state dependent and provide a basis for identifying appropriate neuromodulation timing and improving response stability under complex locomotor conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: