Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Caprine tuberculosis (cTB), caused by members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) represents a significant concern for animal and public health. Antibody-based diagnostic tests have emerged as promising tools to complement ante-mortem official diagnostic techniques in ruminants, which mainly use serum, although alternative, easier-to-collect samples, such as milk, oral fluid, or feces, could also be used. The objective of this exploratory study was to evaluate the reactivity of an in-house P22 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in fecal samples from goats belonging to cTB-infected herds, using serum P22 ELISA and official diagnostic tests as comparators. Methods: Serum and fecal samples were collected from 51 and 42 adult female goats from a high-prevalence herd (n = 149) and a low-prevalence herd (n = 220), respectively, which defecated during sampling. These animals were subjected to official diagnostic techniques: single and comparative intradermal tuberculin tests and the interferon-gamma release assay. As no TB-free herd was available, a preliminary fecal cut-off was established by receiver operating characteristic analysis using serum P22 ELISA as the reference classification. Results: The percentage of positive animals in fecal samples from the high-prevalence herd was 68.6%, while no positive results were observed in the low-prevalence herd. Serum samples showed a higher number of positives in both herds compared to fecal samples (p < 0.05). The agreement between official diagnostic techniques and P22 ELISA (using serum or feces) was slight in general terms. When a combined classification based on all official tests was used as the reference, fecal P22 ELISA detected 58.0% of test-positive goats, none of them in the low-prevalence herd. Conclusions: Under the conditions of this field study (no TB-free controls or post-mortem confirmation of infection were available), fecal P22 ELISA showed limited reactivity compared with serum, particularly in the low-prevalence herd, suggesting limited usefulness for antibody detection in TB infected goats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ortega et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: