Background/Objectives: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score reflects pretransplant disease severity, but does not capture intraoperative factors that may influence post-transplant outcomes. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a composite MELD–erythrocyte transfusion (ERT) score for mortality risk stratification after liver transplantation (LT). Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 125 adult LT recipients between August 2024 and July 2026. A MELD–ERT score (0–2) was constructed using ROC-derived cut-offs for MELD and intraoperative ERT. Prognostic performance for mortality and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using regression, conventional and time-dependent ROC and survival analyses, with bootstrap internal validation. Results: During a median follow-up of 544 days, 30 patients (24.0%) died. MELD and ERT were independently associated with mortality. Mortality increased stepwise across MELD–ERT scores of 0, 1, and 2 (0%, 36.2%, and 59.1%, respectively). The MELD–ERT score showed good discrimination (AUC 0.836, 95% CI 0.776–0.897), with an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.818 after bootstrap validation. Its discrimination was comparable to MELD alone (p = 0.660) and superior to ERT alone (p = 0.002). Time-dependent AUCs for MELD–ERT were 0.893, 0.930, 0.837, and 0.812 at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. OS differed significantly across score categories (log-rank p < 0.001), and high-risk patients had a 9.7-month shorter 24-month RMST (95% CI 5.4–14.3; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The MELD–ERT score provides a simple approach to post-LT mortality risk stratification and demonstrated good discrimination after internal validation. However, it did not significantly outperform MELD alone. External validation is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çetin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: