Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder characterized by lifelong markedly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations from an early age and increased risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Plant foods may provide lipid-lowering benefits; however, evidence in adults with FH is limited. Objective: We sought to evaluate the effects of plant foods and plant-derived compounds on lipid profiles in adults with FH. Methods: CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus were systematically searched for studies investigating plant-based interventions in adults with FH. The primary outcomes assessed included circulating total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (ApoB). Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to heterogeneity in study design, interventions, and outcomes, findings were synthesized narratively. Result: Intervention studies consisted of plant sterols/stanols (n = 6), soy protein (n = 4), soluble dietary fiber (SDF) (n = 3), and whole foods (n = 5). Most participants had heterozygous type IIa FH and were not receiving lipid-lowering medication. Plant-based interventions consistently reduced TC and LDL-C. Plant sterol/stanol and SDF interventions demonstrated LDL-C-lowering effects of 8–21% and 12–22%, respectively. Soy protein lowered TC when substituted for animal protein. Few studies (n = 5) and small sample sizes (8–15 participants) suggested modest LDL-C-lowering effects (6–18%) of prickly pear and alfalfa seeds. Effects on HDL-C, TG, and ApoB showed conflicting or non-significant findings. Conclusions: Plant-based interventions suggest lipid-lowering benefits in adults with FH. However, evidence was limited by few studies, small sample sizes, short durations, and heterogeneous methodologies. Targeted plant-based dietary strategies may offer a practical adjunct to conventional therapy for improving lipid management in adults with FH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Killion et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: