Karachi, located in southern Pakistan, faces high seismic risk due to dense population and non-engineered construction, making it essential to keep hospitals operational before and after earthquakes. Therefore, a comprehensive three-tier methodology is employed herein to quantify the seismic risk index (SRI) of three case study code-conforming hospital buildings (hospitals 1, 2 and 3). The proposed seismic-risk mapping methodology indicates a consistent reduction in risk with higher-performance tiers. At tier 1, hospital 1 shows the highest vulnerability (SRI ≈ 14.0–14.4%), while hospital 2 (8.25%) and hospital 3 (9.16%) exhibit moderate risk. At tier 2, SRI values decrease significantly for all facilities, with hospital 3 (2.99%) and hospital 2 (3.77%) achieving the best performance, whereas hospital 1 remains comparatively weak (≈4.8–6.4%). At tier 3, seismic risk becomes negligible for hospital 2 (0.37%) and hospital 3 (0.39%), while hospital 1 shows further improvement (≈4.0–6.0%) but still requires priority intervention. Overall, the results demonstrate the reliability of the rapid visual screening-based framework for rapid seismic-risk prioritisation; however, detailed analytical assessment is recommended for final decision making. Moreover, future work should expand by employing non-linear dynamic analyses for precise response prediction, developing regional fragility models and investigating retrofit strategies to strengthen the overall resilience of healthcare systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: