Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A critical discussion is given of some of the experimental parameters involved in measurement of the three-, four- and five-fold differential cross sections obtained in (e,2e), (e,(3-1)e) and (e,3e) experiments, respectively. Features observed in the triple coincidence time-delay spectrum are attributed to fully accidental, semi-accidental or true triple coincidence events. Formulas are given that allow computation of the true coincidence rate, the percentage statistical error and the signal-to-background ratio, and to optimize the gas density-electron beam current product for any given experiment. The effective coincidence energy resolutions and transmission functions are defined, and their importance clearly demonstrated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lahmam-Bennani et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: