Key result
Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic loci associated with coronary artery disease, paving the way for personalized medicine, polygenic risk scores, and targeted therapies.
Why the study?
Despite advances in genetic investigations of CAD through GWAS, challenges remain in translating genetic discoveries into clinical applications.
This review highlights how genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic loci associated with CAD, paving the way for personalized medicine, polygenic risk scores, and targeted therapies.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, driven by both environmental and genetic factors. Over the past two decades, our understanding of CAD vulnerability has increased substantially through advancements in genetic investigations. Researchers have extensively examined the genetic basis of CAD through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), identifying numerous loci associated with the disease. The findings have facilitated the early identification of at-risk individuals and the implementation of targeted prevention strategies, while also helping to uncover the pathophysiology of the disease. Despite these advancements, converting genetic discoveries into clinical applications still poses challenges. This review examines the heritable underpinnings of CAD, focusing on the contributions of GWAS to our understanding of the disease. The GWAS methodology, key findings, functional implications, and future prospects are discussed, along with the current status. It highlights how GWAS findings are paving the way for personalized medicine through polygenic risk scores, targeted therapies, and pharmacogenomics-driven interventions for CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tomar et al. (2026) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous genetic loci associated with coronary artery disease, paving the way for personalized medicine, polygenic risk scores, and targeted therapies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: