Key result
Nine-variable clinical model accurately predicts in-hospital outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with ~0.82 C-index.
Why the study?
Most existing predictive models for outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage use a dichotomized approach that underestimates differences in rehabilitation needs and economic costs.
Does an ordinal predictive model accurately estimate in-hospital outcomes based on the Hospital Assessment Scale in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Cohort (n=489)
No
Does an ordinal predictive model accurately estimate in-hospital outcomes based on the Hospital Assessment Scale in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
An ordinal predictive model integrating baseline and dynamic clinical characteristics can accurately predict in-hospital functional outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
May inform aSAH discharge planning; extends prior models but leaves open external validation before adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Most existing predictive models developed to assess outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) use a dichotomized approach. However, this strategy does not reflect the full clinical spectrum of patient status after aSAH and leads to underestimation of differences in rehabilitation needs and associated economic costs. Based on the Hospital Assessment Scale (HAS), we developed and validated an ordinal predictive model to predict in-hospital outcomes after aSAH. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study in Ukraine including 489 patients with aSAH. The outcome was categorized into four HAS scores. Candidate predictors included demographic and medical history variables, clinical and radiological characteristics, including cerebral arterial aneurysm (CAA) features, treatment strategy, and complications. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. An ordinal logistic regression model with proportional odds assumption and penalized maximum likelihood estimation was applied. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling (B = 200). RESULTS: Independent predictors of worse HAS outcome included aneurysm re-rupture, larger aneurysm size, limb paresis at admission, conservative treatment, cerebral vasospasm, and hospital-acquired pneumonia. The final ordinal predictive model was constructed using 9 variables: sex, age groups, presence of CAA re-rupture and limb paresis at admission, size of the CAA, mWFNS grade at admission, treatment strategy, and the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm and hospital-acquired pneumonia. The model demonstrated good discrimination and calibration after internal bootstrap validation (C-index≈0.82). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and internally validated an ordinal predictive model to estimate HAS outcomes after aSAH. The proposed model integrates baseline clinical characteristics and dynamic changes occurring throughout hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solodovnikova et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) (n=489). Clinical and radiological characteristics was evaluated on In-hospital outcomes categorized by Hospital Assessment Scale (HAS) scores. An ordinal predictive model using 9 clinical and radiological variables demonstrated good discrimination for predicting in-hospital outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (C-index≈0.82).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: