Key result
TPVR shows similar mortality to surgery in prosthetic pulmonary valve endocarditis.
Why the study?
Prosthetic pulmonary valve endocarditis limits survival and quality of life in patients with repaired congenital heart disease, and optimal management strategies including TPVR are not well defined.
Does transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement serve as a safe and effective initial treatment strategy or bridge to surgery compared to initial surgical or medical therapy in patients with prosthetic pulmonary valve endocarditis?
Cohort (n=70)
No
Does transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement serve as a safe and effective initial treatment strategy or bridge to surgery compared to initial surgical or medical therapy in patients with prosthetic pulmonary valve endocarditis?
Absolute Event Rate: 20% vs 17.4%
Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement may be a viable bridge to surgical intervention for select high-risk patients with prosthetic pulmonary valve endocarditis, though recurrence rates may be higher compared to surgical replacement.
Comparable mortality with TPVR versus surgery in this small cohort should not yet change practice; leaves open its role as bridge in prosthetic pulmonary valve endocarditis.
Objective: Prosthetic pulmonary valve endocarditis (PPVE) limits survival and quality of life in patients with repaired congenital heart disease. We describe patient outcomes with PPVE in a single center and the application of transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR). Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of patients with PPVE from 2010 to 2022. Subjects were stratified by initial treatment: group 1 comprised surgical pulmonary valve replacement (SPVR), group 2 comprised TPVR, and group 3 comprised initial medical therapy without plans for upfront surgical or procedural intervention. Micro-organism data, posttreatment morbidity, length of stay, recurrence, and mortality are reported. Results: Seventy patients met inclusion criteria; 7% (group 2) underwent TPVR, and 80% of these patients underwent TPVR as a bridge to SPVR. No patients from group 2 had recurrence. Mortality was similar in the upfront SPVR and TPVR groups (group 1: 17.4%, group 2: 20%, group 3: 2.4%). In total, 71% of patients in group 3 eventually required elective SPVR or TPVR, with 25% of patients undergoing TPVR after clearance of blood cultures having recurrence compared with 7.1% of patients who underwent SPVR after clearance of blood cultures. Conclusions: TPVR is a viable bridge to SPVR in select patients with PPVE and may serve as destination therapy. Recurrence may be more common in patients requiring PVR after clearance of infection. Prospective studies of first-line TPVR as a strategy for bridge-to-surgery in select high risk patients and destination therapy in patients with resolution of bacteremia are needed to define treatment pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solano et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Prosthetic pulmonary valve endocarditis (n=70). Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement vs. Surgical pulmonary valve replacement or medical therapy was evaluated on Mortality. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement demonstrated similar mortality (20%) compared to upfront surgical replacement (17.4%) in prosthetic pulmonary valve endocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: