Key result
LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor implantation achieves 100% success without complications in veterinary patients.
Why the study?
Remote long-term rhythm monitoring in dogs and cats to diagnose arrhythmias and evaluate treatment without in-clinic visits had not been evaluated for safety, feasibility, and clinical utility.
Does implantation of the LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor enable safe and feasible remote heart rhythm monitoring in dogs and cats?
Observational (n=18)
Does implantation of the LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor enable safe and feasible remote heart rhythm monitoring in dogs and cats?
The LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitor is safe and feasible for remote heart rhythm monitoring in dogs and cats, allowing for implantation under local anesthesia and providing clinically relevant rhythm data.
Supports feasibility of local-anesthesia ICM implantation in dogs and cats; leaves open long-term utility and generalizability.
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Remote long-term rhythm monitoring enables arrhythmia diagnosis and treatment evaluation without in-clinic visits. This prospective case series evaluated the safety, feasibility, and clinical utility of the insertable cardiac monitor LUX-Dx™ and LUX-Dx II/II+™ in dogs and cats. ANIMALS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups. The diagnostic group included patients with unexplained intermittent clinical signs potentially caused by arrhythmia. The therapeutic group included patients with known arrhythmias requiring assessment of arrhythmia burden and treatment efficacy. Data were analyzed using the LATITUDE Clarity platform. Electrocardiography strips and tachograms were recorded during tachycardia, during bradycardia, or when triggered by owners. The device continuously registered mean heart rates. RESULTS: The device was implanted in 15 dogs and three cats with a 100% success rate and no complications. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia without sedation or general anesthesia. One-lead electrocardiography tracings were sufficient for rhythm interpretation, and remote monitoring and programming were successful in all patients. Clinically useful information contributed to rhythm diagnosis in 8 of 10 diagnostic patients and supported treatment decisions in all therapeutic patients, although changes in arrhythmia burden were not interpreted as proof of clinical benefit or improved prognosis. In two diagnostic cases, the absence of symptom recurrence with normal rhythm data limited conclusions. STUDY LIMITATIONS: Occasional sensing artifacts and misclassification of atrial arrhythmias occurred but were manageable through remote reprogramming. CONCLUSIONS: The LUX-Dx™ and LUX-Dx II/II+™ insertable cardiac monitors enable implantation without general anesthesia and remote monitoring in dogs and cats, providing clinically relevant rhythm data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watering et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Arrhythmias or unexplained intermittent clinical signs (n=18). LUX-Dx and LUX-Dx II/II+ insertable cardiac monitors was evaluated on Safety, feasibility, and clinical utility (implantation success and complication rate). Implantation of LUX-Dx insertable cardiac monitors in 18 dogs and cats achieved a 100% success rate with no complications, providing clinically useful data for rhythm diagnosis and management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: