Key result
Among 636 patients receiving anti-cancer therapy, 59% had hypertension (29.1% newly developed post-treatment), with 19.4% completely untreated and 35.5% remaining hypertensive despite treatment.
Why the study?
Hypertension is common and often underdiagnosed and undertreated in cancer patients receiving anti-cancer therapy, with implications for cardiovascular outcomes and cancer treatment continuation.
What is the prevalence of hypertension and the adequacy of its management in patients receiving anti-cancer therapy?
Observational (n=636)
No
What is the prevalence of hypertension and the adequacy of its management in patients receiving anti-cancer therapy?
Hypertension is highly prevalent but significantly undertreated in patients receiving anti-cancer therapy, highlighting a critical gap in implementing ESC cardio-oncology guidelines.
Introduction Hypertension represents one of the most common comorbidities encountered in patients with cancer undergoing treatment. Hypertension also represents a frequent adverse effect of a variety of different cancer treatments. Despite its prevalence, hypertension in the cancer patient is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated, with potential implications for a patient’s cardiovascular outcomes and ability to continue cancer treatment. The European Society of Cardiology have published guidelines on the management of hypertension in patients with cancer. We performed a single centre study to assess the rates of development of hypertension in patients receiving anti-cancer therapy, and to assess how treatment aligned with ESC Hypertension and Cardio-Oncology recommendations. Methods Information was collected from an Irish academic tertiary referral hospital. Data was prospectively collected on patients who were diagnosed with a solid organ or haematological malignancy, who were receiving anticancer treatment either as an inpatient or as an outpatient attending day hospital. Electronic and handwritten records were reviewed for each patient to identify for the presence of hypertension prior to initiating cancer treatment, current blood pressure status and antihypertensive treatment received. Hypertension treatment regimens were compared to recommended regimens from the European Society of Cardiology Hypertension and Cardio-Oncology guidelines to assess for appropriateness. Results 636 patients with a solid or haematological malignancy received cancer treatment as an inpatient or day patient at our centre over the trial period. 57.5% of patients were male. 66% of patients had a haematological malignancy; 34% had a solid organ malignancy. 97.1% of patients had blood pressure data recorded. 59% of patients had hypertension. Of these, 29.1% developed new hypertension after initiating cancer treatment, while 70.9% had pre-existing hypertension. 19.4% of patients with hypertension were not on treatment. 35.5% of patients on antihypertensive treatment remained hypertensive at current treatment doses. 24.5% of patients remained hypertensive at the time of review, with 10.4% having Grade 2 or 3 hypertension. 50% of patients with new hypertension post treatment were not on correct treatment. Conclusions Hypertension is commonly encountered in patients with cancer, both as a pre-morbid condition, and as an adverse effect of treatment. Despite this, it remains underdiagnosed, and when diagnosed, undertreated. Future efforts will need to focus on improved hypertension management to improve long term cardiovascular outcomes in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenna et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Solid and haematological malignancies (n=636). Anti-cancer therapy was evaluated on Rates of development of hypertension and alignment of treatment with ESC Hypertension and Cardio-Oncology recommendations. Among 636 patients receiving anti-cancer therapy, 59% had hypertension (29.1% newly developed post-treatment), with 19.4% completely untreated and 35.5% remaining hypertensive despite treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: