Key result
Proton radiotherapy preserves myocardial ECV compared to photon radiotherapy, avoiding an absolute ~5% increase.
Why the study?
A direct comparison of the myocardial effects of conventional photon and proton radiotherapy using cardiac MRI had not yet been performed in left-sided breast cancer patients.
Does proton radiotherapy prevent myocardial fibrosis compared to conventional photon radiotherapy in patients with left-sided breast cancer?
Cohort (n=13)
Does proton radiotherapy prevent myocardial fibrosis compared to conventional photon radiotherapy in patients with left-sided breast cancer?
Proton radiotherapy preserves myocardial tissue from fibrosis compared to conventional photon radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer patients over a 12-month period, as measured by MRI-derived extracellular volume.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports potential myocardial sparing with protons versus photons; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before clinical consideration.
Background Conventional photon therapy for breast cancer (BC) is associated with cardiac injury, cardiac fibrosis, and an increased risk for heart failure. Proton RT is capable of more precise dose deposition than photon RT, resulting in lower mean heart (MHD) and cardiac substructure doses, including the left ventricle. In theory, this physical dose advantage of proton RT may limit the extent of myocardial injury and, consequently, the development of fibrosis. Cardiac MRI can quantify myocardial fibrosis by measuring T1 times and, more sensitively, extracellular volume (ECV). A direct comparison of the myocardial effects of conventional photon and proton RT using cardiac MRI has not yet been performed. Purpose To compare the myocardial effects of photon versus proton RT using cardiac MRI-based functional and tissue analysis over a 12-month period in patients with stage II-III, left-sided BC receiving comprehensive radiotherapy. Methods Gadolinium contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI was performed at baseline, before RT, and 12 months after enrollment among persons treated with photon and proton RT. Standard cines were acquired to evaluate left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumetry and function. Global LV strain values were calculated using a feature tracking method. T1 maps were acquired in a mid-ventricular slice of the LV to calculate native T1 times and ECV. T2 maps were captured in the same mid-LV slice. Results The cohort included 13 participants, with a median age of 54 years [IQR 45-62] in the proton group (n=7) and 47 years [44-48] in the photon group (n=6). An anthracycline was administered to 3/7 in the proton group and to 5/6 in the photon group, and trastuzumab to 2/7 in the proton group and to 2/6 in the photon group, preceding RT. The median MHD was 0.9 [0.6-1.2] Gy among proton RT recipients, and 3.5 [2.8-4.2] Gy in the photon group (p=0.001). LV and RV volumetric, strain, and T2 values were similar between the two groups at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Native T1 times at baseline (1,125 [1,095-1,154] msec for protons vs. 1,120 [1,109-1,125] msec for photons, p=0.53) and at 12 months (1,084 [1,063-1,149] msec vs. 1,129 [1,101-1,169] msec, p=0.53) were similar between the groups. Baseline ECV was similar between the groups (median 24% [23-26] for protons vs. 26% [25-27] for photons, p=0.15). At 12 months, the ECV was significantly higher in the photon group (median 25% [22-27] vs. 30% [29-31]; p=0.005). The interval change in ECV in the proton group was -0.9% [-1.2, 0.7] vs. 4.4% [3.7-5.8] for photons (p=0.005). Conclusions Myocardial fibrosis, measured as MRI-derived ECV, was preserved in a small cohort receiving proton RT for left-sided BC, while ECV significantly increased in photon RT recipients over 12 months. These findings warrant further investigation with long-term follow-up to elucidate the potential cardiac benefits of proton RT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juhász et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Stage II-III left-sided breast cancer (n=13). Proton radiotherapy vs. Photon radiotherapy was evaluated on Interval change in myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) (p=0.005). Proton radiotherapy preserved myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) over 12 months, whereas photon radiotherapy significantly increased ECV (interval change -0.9% vs 4.4%; p=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: