Key result
Resting 18F-FDG PET plus clinical markers detects obstructive CAD with ~0.87 AUC.
Why the study?
Accurate diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with suspected unstable angina pectoris using resting 18F-FDG PET myocardial ischemia memory imaging combined with clinical indicators was not established.
Does a diagnostic model combining resting 18F-FDG PET myocardial ischemia memory imaging and clinical indicators improve the diagnostic accuracy of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with suspected unstable angina?
Observational (n=162)
Outcome assessors blinded (images evaluated independently by nuclear medicine physicians and cardiologists unaware of clinical background)
No
Does a diagnostic model combining resting 18F-FDG PET myocardial ischemia memory imaging and clinical indicators improve the diagnostic accuracy of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with suspected unstable angina?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.87 (95% CI 0.82-0.93)
A predictive model combining resting 18F-FDG PET myocardial ischemia memory imaging with five clinical indicators provides high diagnostic accuracy for identifying obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with suspected unstable angina.
May aid noninvasive obstructive CAD detection in suspected unstable angina; leaves open external validation before clinical use.
Background: F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial ischemia memory imaging combined with clinical indicators. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 162 patients with a Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score ≤140 who presented with chest pain or chest tightness and were clinically suspected of having UA. After collecting clinical indicators, predictive factors were screened using logistic regression. A diagnostic model was constructed using binary logistic regression based on the predictive factors, with internal validation via 1,000 bootstrap resamples. The discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical net benefit of the established model were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Furthermore, the enhancement value of the final model over the basic model was quantified using net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Results: =6.15, P=0.63). After internal validation via the bootstrap method, the optimism-corrected AUC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93). Calibration curve and DCA demonstrated that the model exhibited satisfactory calibration and promising clinical utility. Conclusions: F-FDG PET and clinical indicators, demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Suspected unstable angina pectoris (n=162). Diagnostic model combining 18F-FDG PET myocardial ischemia memory imaging and clinical indicators vs. Models using clinical indicators alone or PET imaging alone was evaluated on Discriminative ability (Area Under the Curve) of the diagnostic model for obstructive coronary artery disease (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.93). A diagnostic model integrating resting 18F-FDG PET myocardial ischemia memory imaging with five clinical indicators demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease, yielding an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.87.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: