Why the study?
Patients with advanced kidney disease are often excluded from anticoagulant RCTs, resulting in evidence gaps and practice variation for anticoagulation management.
What are the consensus best practice statements for anticoagulant use in advanced kidney disease?
What are the consensus best practice statements for anticoagulant use in advanced kidney disease?
A modified Delphi process among UK experts resulted in 72 consensus best practice statements to guide anticoagulant use in patients with advanced kidney disease, addressing significant gaps in trial evidence.
Expert consensus guides anticoagulation choices in advanced CKD; leaves open need for dedicated RCTs before changing practice.
BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) are known to have an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events and increased likelihood of atrial fibrillation alongside an increased risk of bleeding. People with advanced kidney disease are often excluded from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anticoagulants, leaving gaps in the evidence base and practice variation. This study aimed to achieve consensus on anticoagulant use in advanced kidney disease to inform national prescribing guidance. METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus on statements relating to anticoagulant use in advanced kidney disease. Three Delphi rounds were predefined, with two rounds of questionnaires followed by online discussion in round three. Panel members included UK experts from the fields of cardiology, nephrology and haematology, who were asked to rate 160 statements with appropriateness and consensus defined by RAND methodology. RESULTS: Twenty-one experts completed rounds one and two of the Delphi. For round three, 11 experts joined a Microsoft Teams discussion. Following round three, there were 72 statements with consensus agreement for inclusion in the guideline, including dose reduction recommendations for therapeutic light molecular weight heparin (LMWH), recommendation for off-label apixaban use in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and trough anti-Xa level monitoring with therapeutic LMWH. Forty-two statements with consensus disagreement for exclusion and 27 with unequivocal consensus. These statements could be used to develop research recommendations. CONCLUSION: This study has led to consensus agreement on a number of statements relating to anticoagulant use in advanced kidney disease in the UK that can be used in national guidance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parker et al. (2026) studied Advanced kidney disease (n=21). Modified Delphi approach for consensus statements was evaluated on Consensus on statements relating to anticoagulant use in advanced kidney disease. A modified Delphi process involving 21 UK experts achieved consensus on 72 practice statements for anticoagulant use in advanced kidney disease to inform national guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: