Key result
Only ~10% of asymptomatic cancer patients with elevated hs-cTnT have obstructive CAD requiring PCI.
Why the study?
What is the prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease as the underlying cause for elevated high-sensitivity troponin T in asymptomatic cancer patients?
Cohort (n=810)
No
What is the prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease as the underlying cause for elevated high-sensitivity troponin T in asymptomatic cancer patients?
Elevated high-sensitivity troponin T in asymptomatic cancer patients is predominantly associated with non-ischemic causes, such as therapy- or tumor-related myocardial injury, rather than obstructive coronary artery disease.
Low yield of obstructive CAD in cancer patients with hs-cTnT elevation; leaves open optimal diagnostic pathways versus cardiotoxicity evaluation.
Background Elevated high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels are frequently observed in cancer patients, yet their clinical significance often remains unclear. In particular, the prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as an underlying cause is insufficiently defined. Methods In this single-center cohort study, 810 asymptomatic cancer patients with elevated hs-cTnT presenting to a cardio-oncology clinic between 2016 and 2023 were analyzed. All patients underwent a prospective structured cardiovascular assessment including clinical evaluation, echocardiography, and biomarker analysis at standardized follow-up appointments. In cases of unexplained troponin elevation, systematic diagnostic work-up for obstructive CAD was performed. Predictors of the presence or absence of obstructive CAD were analyzed using logistic regression. Oncologic therapies were classified according to ESC guidelines regarding cardiotoxic risk. Results Among 810 patients, 470 (58.0%) underwent further evaluation for suspected CAD due to unexplained hs-cTnT elevation. Of these, 47 patients (10.0%) had a relevant obstructive CAD requiring PCI, whereas 90.0% showed no significant coronary stenosis. Independent predictors of the absence of relevant CAD included younger age, female sex, normal NT-proBNP levels, and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Notably, 78.3% of patients without obstructive CAD were receiving oncologic therapies associated with moderate or high cardiotoxic risk. Conclusions In asymptomatic cancer patients, elevated hs-cTnT is not consistently driven by obstructive CAD. While elevated hs-cTnT levels associated with a worthened outcome, non-ischemic causes, including therapy- or tumor-related myocardial injury, appear to predominate. These findings highlight the need for individualized risk stratification and careful interpretation of cardiac biomarkers in oncology patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brauer et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic cancer patients with elevated high-sensitivity troponin T (n=810). Unexplained elevated high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT) was evaluated on Presence of relevant obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring PCI. Among asymptomatic cancer patients evaluated for unexplained hs-cTnT elevation, only 10.0% had obstructive coronary artery disease requiring PCI, indicating predominantly non-ischemic causes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: