Key result
MPN status is not associated with increased in-hospital mortality during catheter ablation for AF.
Why the study?
Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, who have prothrombotic and inflammatory phenotypes, remain understudied.
Does catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms lead to different in-hospital mortality and complications compared to those without the condition?
Observational (n=280,450)
Yes
Does catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms lead to different in-hospital mortality and complications compared to those without the condition?
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms is safe, achieving comparable in-hospital mortality and major complication rates to the general population.
Supports AF ablation consideration in MPN; leaves open need for prospective confirmation on safety and outcomes.
Background Catheter ablation is the standard of care for symptomatic atrial fibrillation, yet safety and efficacy in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), a class of hematologic malignancies conferring prothrombotic and inflammatory phenotypes, remains understudied. Methods We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2022), representing 280,450 adult patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation across 147 strata and 17,330 primary sampling units. We identified MPN patients using ICD-10 diagnosis and employed multivariate logistic regression adjusting for 24 covariates including demographics, charlson comorbidity index, and hospital characteristics to assess in-hospital mortality and complications. Results 1,070 of the catheter ablation patients identified were MPN patients (381.5 per 100,000 ablations). In-hospital mortality rates were comparable between MPN and non-MPN cohorts (0.93% vs. 1.11%, adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.14-2.39, p=0.451). While unadjusted analysis revealed elevated acute kidney injury (AKI) in MPN patients (27.1% vs. 21.0%, p=0.027), this association was attenuated after multivariable adjustment (adjusted OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.84-1.75, p=0.294). MPN status independently predicted longer hospital length of stay (+1.5 days, p=0.026). No significant differences emerged in major bleeding (1.4% vs. 1.7%), cardiac tamponade (0.5% vs. 1.3%), stroke (2.3% vs. 1.4%), or major adverse cardiac events. Temporal trend analysis from 2016-2022 demonstrated stable MPN prevalence (p=0.949) with no significant interaction between MPN status and year for mortality outcomes (p=0.668). Conclusions Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in MPN patients achieves mortality rates comparable to the general population undergoing ablation, with AKI representing the primary area of heightened vigilance. The results of our study support the procedural safety of catheter ablation in selected MPN patients. These findings identify a base for standardized cardio-oncology protocols addressing arrhythmia management in patients with MPN and other hematologic malignancies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolad et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (n=280,450). Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) status vs. Non-MPN status was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.14-2.39, p=0.451). Myeloproliferative neoplasm status did not increase in-hospital mortality compared to non-MPN status in adults undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (0.93% vs 1.11%; OR 0.58, p=0.451).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: