Key result
Right bundle branch ablation plus dual-chamber pacing resolves post-TAVR BBR-VT, avoiding ICD implantation.
Why the study?
Conduction disturbances after TAVR can rarely cause bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia (BBR-VT), but management strategies without ICD are not well described.
Case Report (n=1)
Post-TAVR bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia can be successfully managed with curative ablation and pacing, potentially avoiding unnecessary ICD implantation in selected patients.
Post-TAVR wide-complex tachycardia may represent BBR-VT; single case leaves open need for prospective EP evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances are common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), usually manifesting as atrioventricular block. Rarely, injury to the His-Purkinje system may create substrate for bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia (BBR-VT). CASE SUMMARY: A 78-year-old man developed new conduction abnormalities after TAVR and was discharged on ambulatory monitoring. Loop recorder interrogation revealed recurrent symptomatic wide-complex tachycardia. Repeat electrophysiology study demonstrated inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia with His-V-His activation confirming BBR-VT. Two reciprocal reentrant circuits were inducible: one with antegrade conduction over the right bundle branch (left bundle branch block-pattern QRS) and the other in the reverse direction (right bundle branch block-pattern QRS). Right bundle branch ablation terminated the arrhythmia and induced persistent right bundle branch block. Given paroxysmal complete atrioventricular block, a dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted. With preserved ventricular function and no additional substrate, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion was deferred. DISCUSSION: BBR-VT is a rare but serious complication of post-TAVR conduction injury. Early recognition allows curative ablation and tailored device therapy. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Post-TAVR conduction delay can facilitate BBR-VT. Successful ablation with pacing may avoid implantable cardioverter insertion implantation in selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desai et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Bundle branch re-entrant ventricular tachycardia post-TAVR (n=1). Right bundle branch ablation and dual-chamber pacemaker was evaluated. Right bundle branch ablation combined with a dual-chamber pacemaker successfully treated post-TAVR bundle branch re-entrant ventricular tachycardia in 1 patient, avoiding ICD implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: