Key result
Pulse rate variability cannot reliably replace heart rate variability, worsened by aging and postural changes.
Why the study?
The interchangeability of pulse rate variability and heart rate variability in older adults and under postural changes remains uncertain, with unclear underlying mechanisms.
Does pulse rate variability derived from photoplethysmography reliably substitute heart rate variability in older adults and during postural changes?
Observational (n=65)
No
Does pulse rate variability derived from photoplethysmography reliably substitute heart rate variability in older adults and during postural changes?
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 16%
Pulse rate variability from wearable PPG cannot reliably substitute ECG-derived heart rate variability for short-term variability in older adults, particularly during postural changes.
Clinicians should avoid substituting PPG-derived PRV for ECG HRV in older adults or during postural changes; leaves open the need for validated alternatives in dynamic monitoring.
OBJECTIVE: Pulse rate variability (PRV) derived from photoplethysmography is often used as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV) in daily monitoring. However, their interchangeability in older adults and under postural change remains uncertain, potentially leading to misinterpretation in practical usage. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying HRV-PRV differences are incompletely understood. APPROACH: We evaluated HRV-PRV interchangeability across 18 features during four kinds of orthostatic tests in 35 younger and 42 older adults. Bland-Altman analysis assessed the interchangeability in different postural change conditions. Linear mixed models (LMMs) quantified the effects of age, sex, and postural changes. Mediation analysis examined whether mean arterial compliance, total peripheral resistance, and cardiac contractility mediated these effects. RESULTS: 16 features were interchangeable at individual level in younger adults, while only seven in older adults. Both aging and posture significantly reduced the interchangeability. A significant age-sex interaction was identified for metrics reflecting slow variation, with older females exhibiting a most pronounced HRV-PRV agreement decline. Mediation analysis showed that while hemodynamic parameters differed significantly across subgroups, they cannot explain the age- or posture-related decline in HRV-PRV consistency. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings demonstrate that PRV cannot reliably substitute HRV in older adults, especially for features reflecting rapid physiological dynamics. The significant age-sex interaction highlights the necessity for calibration models particularly for monitoring elderly populations. These insights are essential for daily-life monitoring, emphasizing the need for reliable HRV assessment in older adults and after posture change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=65). Aging and postural change vs. Younger age and resting state was evaluated on Interchangeability between pulse rate variability (PRV) and heart rate variability (HRV) at the individual level (across 18 features). Pulse rate variability cannot reliably substitute heart rate variability for assessing short-term physiological dynamics, as interchangeability is significantly reduced by aging and postural changes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: