Key result
Initial dual antihypertensive therapy linked to ~52% higher rate of target BP control vs monotherapy.
Why the study?
Longitudinal evidence on the time required to achieve target blood pressure and its predictors among newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in Ethiopia was limited.
Does early initiation of dual antihypertensive therapy reduce the time to achieve target blood pressure in newly diagnosed hypertensive adults?
Cohort (n=522)
No
Does early initiation of dual antihypertensive therapy reduce the time to achieve target blood pressure in newly diagnosed hypertensive adults?
Hazard Ratio: 1.52 (95% CI 1.12–2.06)
p-value: p=0.007
Newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in this setting experienced substantial delays exceeding one year to achieve target blood pressure, but early initiation of dual antihypertensive therapy was associated with significantly faster BP control.
Background: Timely blood pressure (BP) control is essential for preventing hypertension-related complications. However, longitudinal evidence on the time required to achieve target BP and its predictors among newly diagnosed hypertensive patients remains limited in Ethiopia. This study assessed the time to BP control and its predictors among newly diagnosed hypertensive adults receiving care at a comprehensive hospital in Central Ethiopia. Methods: A five-year retrospective cohort study was conducted among 522 newly diagnosed hypertensive adults enrolled between 2021 and 2025. The primary outcome was time to BP control, defined as achieving a BP <140/90 mmHg at two consecutive follow-up visits. Participants were selected using systematic random sampling, and data were extracted from medical records by trained personnel. Missing data were handled using hot-deck imputation. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare time to BP control across groups. Variables meeting the proportional hazards assumption and a bivariate screening criterion of P < 0.25 were included in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to identify independent predictors. Statistical significance was declared at P < 0.05. Results: Of the 522 patients included, 377 (72.2%) achieved BP control during 191,056 person-days of follow-up, corresponding to an incidence rate of 1.97 BP control events per 1,000 person-days (72 events per 100 person-years). The overall median time to BP control was 375 days (12.5 months; 95% CI: 338–410). Males required a longer median time than females (400 vs. 352 days). Urban residence (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.05–1.74), initiation with dual antihypertensive therapy (AHR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.12–2.06), and normal total cholesterol levels (AHR = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.48–2.96) were independently associated with a shorter time to BP control. In contrast, the presence of comorbidities (AHR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.16–0.33) and advanced baseline blood pressure severity independently prolonged the time required to achieve target levels. Compared to those who had baseline SBP of 140-159 mmHg, patients who had systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 160-179 mmHg and ≥180 mmHg showed significantly reduced rates of achieving timely blood pressure control (AHR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47–0.80 and AHR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.24–0.54, respectively). Similarly, patients who had diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 99-109 mmHg and ≥110 mmHg had strongly delayed treatment success (AHR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.41–0.71 and AHR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.23–0.56, respectively) compared with patients with DBP of 90-99 mmHg. Conclusion: Newly diagnosed hypertensive patients experienced substantial delays in achieving target BP, with a median time to control exceeding one year. Early initiation of dual antihypertensive therapy and urban residence were associated with faster BP control, whereas higher baseline systolic and/or diastolic BP levels and comorbidities significantly prolonged the time to achieving target BP. Targeted management strategies for high-risk patients may help accelerate BP control and improve clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mergiaw et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Primary hypertension (n=522). Dual antihypertensive therapy vs. Monotherapy was evaluated on Time to blood pressure control (<140/90 mmHg at two consecutive follow-up visits) (AHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-2.06, p=0.007). In newly diagnosed hypertensive adults, initiation of dual antihypertensive therapy increased the rate of achieving target blood pressure control by 52% compared to monotherapy (AHR 1.52).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: