Key result
High AI-quantified late gadolinium enhancement (≥15%) was independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death and SCD-equivalent events (adjusted HR 4.67).
Why the study?
The prognostic value of artificial intelligence-based late gadolinium enhancement quantification using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients was not established.
Does artificial intelligence-quantified high late gadolinium enhancement (≥ 15%) predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=142)
No
Does artificial intelligence-quantified high late gadolinium enhancement (≥ 15%) predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Hazard Ratio: 4.67 (95% CI 1.43–15.3)
Absolute Event Rate: 21.2% vs 4.6%
p-value: p=0.011
Automated AI-based quantification of late gadolinium enhancement ≥ 15% is an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, offering an objective and reproducible biomarker for risk stratification.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of artificial intelligence (AI)-based late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) quantification using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 142 patients with HCM (mean age 58.5 ± 13.7 yr; 72.5% men) who underwent CMR at Yeungnam University Medical Center between 2015 and 2023. LGE was quantified using an AI-based segmentation algorithm with a 6-standard deviation method. Patients were stratified into a high LGE group (≥ 15%) and a low LGE group (< 15%). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, including sudden cardiac death (SCD) and SCD-equivalent events. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 59 months, the high LGE group experienced a higher incidence of the primary outcome compared with the low LGE group (21.2% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.0067). After adjustment for age and left ventricular ejection fraction, a high AI-quantified LGE burden (≥ 15%) remained independently associated with the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 4.67, 95% confidence interval 1.43-15.30, p = 0.011). Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined an optimal LGE cutoff of 8% for predicting the primary outcome (area under the curve 0.821). Patients with LGE ≥ 8% exhibited markedly increased rates of the primary outcome (18.2% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and SCD/SCD-equivalent events (13.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.00074). CONCLUSION: AI-based quantitative assessment of LGE is an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HCM and may represent a clinically meaningful imaging biomarker for risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=142). High AI-quantified late gadolinium enhancement (≥ 15%) vs. Low late gadolinium enhancement (< 15%) was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death (including sudden cardiac death) and SCD-equivalent events (adjusted HR 4.67, 95% CI 1.43-15.30, p=0.011). High AI-quantified late gadolinium enhancement (≥15%) was independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death and SCD-equivalent events (adjusted HR 4.67).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: